Suspicion Distribution DivisionPublic preview / Project in formation
SUSCORP.

A suspiciously beneficial enterprise

Your independent thinking is of great interest to us.

Our agenda is simple: help you investigate claims, trace sources, and notice when a graph is doing something weird.

Begin your orientation Investigate Suscorp

Free educational resources. No account required.
Your unquestioning loyalty is neither requested nor useful.

Corporate directive № 001

Please distrust responsibly.

Including us. Obviously.

01 / Orientation · The method

Thinking for yourself.
Now with a procedure.

Not a list of people to trust. A repeatable way to check what a claim actually supports.

  1. Pause.

    Identify the exact claim. Notice the reaction it invites before you share it.

    Urgency is not evidence.

  2. Trace.

    Find the original report, dataset, or recording. Restore the context a repost may have left behind.

    A screenshot is not a pedigree.

  3. Check.

    Examine the evidence, comparisons, and uncertainty. Does the conclusion go further than the facts?

    Confidence is not a citation.

Then map the incentives. Who benefits? Useful context—not automatic proof of dishonesty.

Calibrate your conclusion. Say what the evidence supports. Updating your view is permitted under company policy.

02 / Field manuals · Learning resources

Your first assignments.
Entirely optional.

No entrance exam. No loyalty oath. Start with one chart and a few better questions.

FM–001 / Chart inspectionHTML

Read the chart.
Then read around it.

A fictional warm-up, then three real exhibits: clear context, a design mistake, and documented misleading persuasion. The axes are available for questioning.

Open the chart lesson
FM–002 / Desk referencePrint-ready

Before you
share that chart.

Nine questions about sources, scales, comparisons, and uncertainty. Suitable for desks and inconvenient moments.

Open the printable checklist
FM–003 / Source tracingNew briefing

A citation is not a force field.

Follow a claim past the links, quotations, and repeated headlines. Learn when five websites are citing one source—and when the supporting evidence has quietly left the building.

Trace the source
FM–004 / Scientific articlesNew briefing

A study is not a verdict.

Inspect the methods, read the uncertainty, and find out whether “statistically significant” has been promoted beyond its qualifications. Includes a fictional paper with an overambitious headline.

Read the study

Preview resources. More lessons and videos are planned, not yet available. Even our ominous expansion has limits.

03 / Accountability is not classified

Do not trust us
because of the suit.

The corporate theater is a joke. The obligation to explain our reasoning is not.

Inspect our method, question our examples, and check our limitations. Sources, funding, and corrections belong in the open—not behind the brand.

Investigate Suscorp